A spokesperson for Oddspedia said the analytics review reveals more deep-seeded reasons than simply the political climate.
Rather than a laser-focused, deep dive into the details of Trump’s attempt to subvert the 2020 election, virtually all of the nine justices instead raised larger questions, peppered with hypotheticals ...
Trump’s remarks at events in Wisconsin and Michigan were being closely watched after he received a $9,000 fine for making public statements about people connected to the criminal case.